Bridging the gap between studying and exam readiness

Case study

ROLE

UX, UI, Research

TOOLS

Figma

PLATFORM

iOS

COMPANY

Stairway

Why revision feels so broken for students

For many GCSE students, revision isn’t just about memorising facts-it's about applying knowledge under exam conditions. Yet traditional revision methods often fall short. This disconnect left them feeling uncertain about their readiness and ability to perform well.

Every GCSE student knows the pressure of exam season—the endless notes, the last-minute cramming, the uncertainty of whether anything is actually sinking in. But how do they really revise? And more importantly, what makes it work (or not work) for them?

To find out. I ran user testing sessions with 20 students. digging into their revision habits, struggles, and what they wished was different. Here are some of the key insights:

Background

“I use past papers because they feel like the real exam— like the way the questions are actually written”

“It would be so much easier if I just knew what I needed to focus on

I switch between different websites— one for exams, one for learning, and another for tracking my syllabus”

“I tend to study a lot but it’s hard to tell if I’m actually learning

The challenge wasn't just about providing resources. It was about designing a revision experience that guided students towards exam readiness, making it clear what they should work on next and giving them confidence that their effort was paying of.

Where do Topic Quizzes fit into the learning flow?

Before any topic content:

Positioning the quiz at the start of the topic would act as a pre- diagnostic tool, helping to assess prior knowledge. This could personalise the learning experience by identifying gaps early on and tailoring recommendations accordingly.

After completing all lessons:

Unlocking the quiz only after the learner had completed all lessons would allow it to function as a summative assessment tool, testing their understanding of the material and providing validation for their learning.

It was time to start wireframing the experience. Quizzes lived at topic-level which gave me confidence first to begin exploring how quizzes display within the existing screens.

To determine the optimal placement of Topic Quizzes within the learning journey, I developed a working prototype and tested it with students. This was essential to uncover whether Topic Quizzes were a pre-diagnostic tool or a summative learning tool.

Key Insights

10 of 12 students preferred topic quiz at the end of their topic learning.

4 of 12 students would have set a timer for their topic quiz.

8 of 12 struggled to find the topic quiz.

12 of 12 understood how to review their quiz after completion.

If i guess and get it right, the quiz might think I know it, but I really don’t... I’d rather skip so it knows I need to work on that.. (lesson).
— Student

During one of the sessions, a student paused at a question. muttering, “I think it's B. but Im' not sure." They clicked an answer based on a hunch but admitted afterward that they would have preferred to skip it if there had been a pass option. This moment unraveled a key behavior: students were more likely to guess if they had a slight inkling about the answer, but they would’ve preferred to pass if they were completely unsure. I made changes to the wireframes to reflect these new insights.

Post testing. I began to work up hi-fidelity changes from the wireframes to improve usability. The timer functionality did not test very well therefore we pushed this back into the backlog to do more research on for a potential later iteration.

40%

of active students used Topic Quizzes within the first month.

74%

of students who started a quiz completed it, showing strong engagement.

38%

of students revisited at least one lesson after recieving a quiz recommendation